I never lived in a coal camp, but I know someone who did. The name of that coal camp is Crichton, West Virginia. The name of the person I know is Larry, my husband. I've heard 39 years of stories from Crichton, and this is my favorite Christmas story.
Larry grew up in a company house that his father bought in the fifties. All the houses along the street were the same, small and covered with white clapboard. At the time there were four children in the family, and I'm sure that those four were a houseful. Christmas was a particularly active time of year with the four Estep children on pins and needles, scanning the Christmas catalogues while stoking up on RC Colas and homemade Christmas candy.
One day Jim and Helen went to Rainelle. I'm guessing that they had some "private" Christmas shopping to do, but whatever the reason they left the children at home by themselves. As luck would have it, while Jim and Helen were gone, a man came through the coal camp selling Christmas trees from the back of a pick-up truck. The Estep clan decided to take advantage of this opportunity to surprise their parents; they gathered enough coins to buy the tree. It was a group decision, and they picked the best tree they could buy with the money they had.
Since I didn't see the tree, and there are no pictures, I can only imagine that the tree bore a striking resemblance to poor Charlie Brown's Christmas tree. At the best, the Estep tree was an irregular form of fir tree.
The Esteps were industrious children. They put the tree up in the stand in a corner of the living room and turned the bare side to the wall. They gathered the ornaments from the closet where they were stored. They put on the lights, the ornaments, the star on the top. As sister, Becky, put the last ornament on the front of the tree, the weight from that delicate glass ornament was just enough weight to pull that one-sided tree smashing to the floor. The children stood staring at the mess of Christmas lying in the floor.
Larry, being an inventive child, jumped into action. He got a hammer and a nail and a piece of rope. All important items in Christmas decorating. He tied the rope around the tree and pulled it up to a standing position. Then he nailed the rope to the wall behind the tree. Problem solved! The decorated tree stood straight, a bright and shining beacon of Christmas in the little house in Crichton.
I've often wondered what Helen did when she came home. Did she laugh? Did she cry? Did she do both? Christmas is enjoyed most by children, and this was their tree, probably one of the most beautiful they ever had.
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Lessons I Learned in My First Year of Retirement
One year. It's been that long since I loaded my microwave and refrigerator into the back of my CRV and left my office at Virginia Highlands Community College for the last time. One year!
There is a commercial running on television now that shows pictures of people on their first day of retirement. Now why didn't I think to take a picture? My blog from December 18, 2010, is the closest thing I have to a picture: remember the ice storm that knocked out our electricity on my first day of retirement? Maybe I don't need a picture of that.
The past year has been educational for me, leading me to explore my "discomfort" zone.
Lesson 1: My house will never be completely clean. One year ago I had mighty plans for completing all those jobs that never seemed to get finished. I gamely jumped into cleaning out the "attic", washing windows, cleaning carpets, and throwing out old clothes. I made quite a bit of progress, as was evidenced by the many trips to the dumpster with items from my collection of cardboard boxes. But the windows are dirty again, and the "attic", while it has much more open space, still needs to have things picked up off the floor. If I didn't finish it in a year, I don't think it's ever going to be completely clean.
Lesson 2: I don't have to dust every week.
Lesson 3: I don't like to travel. It's wonderful that retired people go on cruises and have bucket lists of exotic places they want to visit. I wish them well, but I lack the spontaneity gene, so I will never throw a few things into a bag to take off on an adventure. My trips require exhausting amounts of planning, and I believe I've seen just about everything I wish to see on this planet.
Lesson 4: Snow isn't so bad if you never have to leave the house. Instead of getting nose bleeds when the snow begins to stick to the roads, I just make a cup of apple-cinnamon tea, and turn on Walker, Texas Ranger.
Lesson 5: Chuck Norris is a very interesting person.
Lesson 6: An incredible amount of socializing can be done at Food City, our local grocery store. Once I spoke to someone at Wal-Mart in Marion, saw them a little later at the post office in Chilhowie, and wrapped up conversations with them at Food City. I'm sure they thought I was stalking them. The old-age circuit is completed every weekday morning, except on holidays. I catch up with old friends in the bread aisle, find out all the news in the dairy aisle.
Lesson 7: You never know what will happen next, so stop trying to figure it out. There is just no way of knowing all the wonderful things coming along in your life. In the spring I worked with high school students to improve their college placement test scores, and now I work at preparing the bulletins for our Sunday services at church. Both of these jobs would have been impossible for me if I hadn't been retired. Snow storms and rainbows come along at the most unexpected times.
Lesson 8: You can grow as much in a weedy garden as you can in a neatly hoed garden. The weather has more to do with a productive garden than hours of pulling up especially prolific indigenous plant life. If you like the way a cultivated garden looks, it's good to get out the hoe and take it for a test drive. It can be therapeutic.
Lesson 9: Paul Farris knows a thousand stories. A few weeks ago, I told him he should write a book, and he said that yes, indeed, he maybe could fill one up. During the summer months, Paul (my neighbor) runs over a few tomatoes to me or maybe some yellow squash. Along with the vegetables or freshly-canned salsa, there are always a few stories to share. Some are about fishing, some about Chilhowie in the forties, or some maybe about building houses. He can tell a good story.
Lesson 10: The more things change, the more they stay the same. Even on days that I don't have to set the alarm, I'm usually awake by 6:30. I've had very few days with absolutely nothing to do. As a matter of fact, I don't think I've had any days with absolutely nothing to do. There is always something that needs attention, and I have a mental list of things I want to do when I have the time. I've never been bored in the last year.
Humble yourselves, therefore, under God's mighty hand, that he may lift you up in due time. Cast all your anxiety on him because he cares for you. 1 Peter 5:6-7
There is a commercial running on television now that shows pictures of people on their first day of retirement. Now why didn't I think to take a picture? My blog from December 18, 2010, is the closest thing I have to a picture: remember the ice storm that knocked out our electricity on my first day of retirement? Maybe I don't need a picture of that.
The past year has been educational for me, leading me to explore my "discomfort" zone.
Lesson 1: My house will never be completely clean. One year ago I had mighty plans for completing all those jobs that never seemed to get finished. I gamely jumped into cleaning out the "attic", washing windows, cleaning carpets, and throwing out old clothes. I made quite a bit of progress, as was evidenced by the many trips to the dumpster with items from my collection of cardboard boxes. But the windows are dirty again, and the "attic", while it has much more open space, still needs to have things picked up off the floor. If I didn't finish it in a year, I don't think it's ever going to be completely clean.
Lesson 2: I don't have to dust every week.
Lesson 3: I don't like to travel. It's wonderful that retired people go on cruises and have bucket lists of exotic places they want to visit. I wish them well, but I lack the spontaneity gene, so I will never throw a few things into a bag to take off on an adventure. My trips require exhausting amounts of planning, and I believe I've seen just about everything I wish to see on this planet.
Lesson 4: Snow isn't so bad if you never have to leave the house. Instead of getting nose bleeds when the snow begins to stick to the roads, I just make a cup of apple-cinnamon tea, and turn on Walker, Texas Ranger.
Lesson 5: Chuck Norris is a very interesting person.
Lesson 6: An incredible amount of socializing can be done at Food City, our local grocery store. Once I spoke to someone at Wal-Mart in Marion, saw them a little later at the post office in Chilhowie, and wrapped up conversations with them at Food City. I'm sure they thought I was stalking them. The old-age circuit is completed every weekday morning, except on holidays. I catch up with old friends in the bread aisle, find out all the news in the dairy aisle.
Lesson 7: You never know what will happen next, so stop trying to figure it out. There is just no way of knowing all the wonderful things coming along in your life. In the spring I worked with high school students to improve their college placement test scores, and now I work at preparing the bulletins for our Sunday services at church. Both of these jobs would have been impossible for me if I hadn't been retired. Snow storms and rainbows come along at the most unexpected times.
Lesson 8: You can grow as much in a weedy garden as you can in a neatly hoed garden. The weather has more to do with a productive garden than hours of pulling up especially prolific indigenous plant life. If you like the way a cultivated garden looks, it's good to get out the hoe and take it for a test drive. It can be therapeutic.
Lesson 9: Paul Farris knows a thousand stories. A few weeks ago, I told him he should write a book, and he said that yes, indeed, he maybe could fill one up. During the summer months, Paul (my neighbor) runs over a few tomatoes to me or maybe some yellow squash. Along with the vegetables or freshly-canned salsa, there are always a few stories to share. Some are about fishing, some about Chilhowie in the forties, or some maybe about building houses. He can tell a good story.
Lesson 10: The more things change, the more they stay the same. Even on days that I don't have to set the alarm, I'm usually awake by 6:30. I've had very few days with absolutely nothing to do. As a matter of fact, I don't think I've had any days with absolutely nothing to do. There is always something that needs attention, and I have a mental list of things I want to do when I have the time. I've never been bored in the last year.
Humble yourselves, therefore, under God's mighty hand, that he may lift you up in due time. Cast all your anxiety on him because he cares for you. 1 Peter 5:6-7
Sunday, November 27, 2011
The Legendary Isaac Bellangee
When I was a little girl, I once asked my dad that age-old question, "Where did we come from?" He could have answered simply and truthfully, "Summers County", but he knew that I was looking for a deeper truth, even at that young age. He told me that we were Irish and possibly a little Dutch. He didn't explain further, so I let it go at that, and now I'm left wondering what the heck he meant by that. It turns out, though, that the Ballengee family tree blossomed from French roots.
The best research on the Ballengee family of Summers County, West Virginia, indicates that the family patriarch, Isaac Ballengee, came from the Evi Bellange family in Burlington County, New Jersey. The various Ballengee family members fromNew Jersey have
been well-documented, but few early records exist for Isaac Bellangee, who settled in
the mountains of early Virginia . Isaac lived through Indian wars and a
revolution that formed a new government, but there is no documentation to prove
with certainty who his parents were.
Because of the lack of documentation there is quite a lot of legend that exists around Isaac, and when legend is repeated often enough, it is perceived as being factual, so I want to set the record straight by using what we know is true about Isaac.
The best research on the Ballengee family of Summers County, West Virginia, indicates that the family patriarch, Isaac Ballengee, came from the Evi Bellange family in Burlington County, New Jersey. The various Ballengee family members from
Because of the lack of documentation there is quite a lot of legend that exists around Isaac, and when legend is repeated often enough, it is perceived as being factual, so I want to set the record straight by using what we know is true about Isaac.
The Augusta County, Virginia, land grant for Isaac Bellangee in 1767. |
-
Some say that Isaac married
his wife, Jane, in Stokes County, NC about 1767. This is not true because
- Another source says that three
Ballengee brothers, Isaac, Eli, and one unnamed, came to
At least one writer reported that Isaac served in the Revolutionary War and was on guard duty in 1776 in
Some say that Isaac was born in 1719 on the Isle of Jersey in the English Channel when it was under British control, and another says that Isaac was a sailor who married Jean in NC about 1777. The Summers County Isaac was born about 1719, but there is no documentation that he was born on the Isle of Jersey. A search that was completed by the Channel Islands Family History Society on the Isle of Jersey revealed no mention of the Bellange surname, although there was a Bellanger family on Jersey, but not until the 18th Century when our Ballengees were already firmly established in America.[1] In 1777 Isaac lived in Botetourt Co., Virginia. French-speaking immigrants who settled in New England and Virginia before 1680 were residents of the Channel Islands of Guernsey and Jersey, but most of them had lived in the Channel Islands a generation before they came to
On the subject of Isaac being a sailor, An Index to Seamen’s Protection Certificate Applications in the Port of Philadelphia, 1796-1823 (Dixon, 2001) lists an Isaac Bellangee. He is registered in the years 1807 and 1815 at the age of 18 and 25 respectively with a birth state of New Jersey. This may be the Isaac referred to by other researchers, but it is not the Isaac who settled Botetourt and Greenbrier Counties because he was deceased before 1807.
One researcher reported in The Greenbrier County Family Heritage Book that Isaac was married in
Another legend says that after their marriage, Isaac and Jean settled on the farm of his brother, Eli, near the Greenbrier River. A few years later they bought 185 acres. Isaac actually had a brother named Evi, but there is no documentation that he had a brother named Eli nor is there documentation that Evi obtained land or lived on the
Another mistaken story says that in 1787 Isaac received a land grant of 210 acres in
Nor is it true that Isaac received a land grant for service in the Revolution ca. 1780 nor that Jean was patented a tract of land 2 November 1800. In 1780 Isaac lived in
Harmon Ballengee says that Isaac was in
J. Bellangee Cox writes that Isaac was the son of Ives and Christian Bellangee, which is true, but much of Mr. Cox's information is not accurate. He says that Isaac moved from Pennsylvania to New Jersey, married, and had four children. His wife died, and Isaac left the children with his brother, Samuel, when he moved to
There is also debate about who Isaac’s parents were. There is no definitive documentation to prove that the Isaac Ballengee who settled in Augusta/Botetourt County, Virginia, was the son of Ives, Sr. and Christian Delaplaine Ballengee of
"I have no doubt that we are of the same family [descendents of Ives Bellangee, Sr.], for I very well recollect hearing father say that his grandfather’s name was Evi, so that it appears to be quite a favorite name in the family. . . There are five of us and all are living; our names are as follows: Evi, Edward, Isaac, Sarah Jane and James the youngest who is 24 years old.”
McClung
(and other researchers) feel that if Isaac were born in 1719, he would have
been too old to settle wilderness territory in Botetourt and Greenbrier Counties
between 1767 and 1787 when he acquired land on the Greenbrier River . At the time his land was surveyed in Augusta County in 1767, Isaac would have been
nearly 50 years old. His land grant in
Greenbrier County was obtained in 1787 when Isaac’s age would have been about
68. The earliest recorded date for the
birth of one of his children is 1778 (Isaac was about 61 years old), and the
last child was born in 1789 (Isaac was 72).
The argument is that if Isaac were born to Evi, Jr.(married first in 1724 when he was disowned by the Quakers and married secondly to Susanna English in 1738), then Isaac would have been a much younger
man when he first came to Augusta County, and the dates and ages would have
been more probable.
While
pioneering at an advanced age and fathering seven children at 60 to 70 years of
age would be remarkable, it would not be impossible. General Andrew Lewis, famous for the Battle
of Point Pleasant during Lord Dunmore’s War, was born in 1720 and also would
have been in his 50s when settling western Virginia and fighting as a
soldier. As for the reference in the
letter to Isaac’s father’s name being Evi, that name is a derivative of Yves
(found in documents as Yves, Eve, Ive, Ivi, Evi), and the name Evi is first found on land records when Evi Bellange, Sr. bought land there in 1697, so the name "Evi" could refer to the Bellangee who died in Burlington County, NJ, around 1720, and not necessarily his son, Evi, Jr. So I don't have any proof that Evi Bellangee, Sr., is Isaac's father, but since Evi, Sr.'s will mentions a son, Isaac, and there is no record of Evi, Jr., having a son named Isaac, I'll say that my great-great-great-great grandfather is the son of Evi Bellangee, Sr.
How many fantastical legends are there about Isaac Ballengee? More than I can count. If all of these stories were true, old Isaac would need a much longer life to accomplish everything attributed to him. Let these legends that are listed stand as proof that not everything that is printed up is true.
[1] Email
from Henry Coutanche to Janet Ballengee Estep, 11 April 2010.
[2] Butler , Jon, The
Huguenots in America ,
1983, p. 43.
[3] Greenbrier County Family Heritage Book, 1997, p. 30.
[4] Hinshaw,
William, The Encyclopedia of Quaker
Genealogy, 1750-1930, Vol. II, 1938, p. 197.
[5] J.
Bellangee Cox Records, 6 September 1895, Volume Gen Cp-2, Genealogical Society,
PA.
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Riding the Turnpike in Sewell Valley
The James River and Kanawha Turnpike crossing Little Sewell Mountain. |
If you do much investigation into the history of western Greenbrier County in West Virginia, you will read that U.S. Route 60 follows the historic James River and Kanawha Turnpike. Well, that's true for the most part. As U.S. Route 60 (now known as the Midland Trail) was constructed, it generally followed the path of the old turnpike road, swallowing up the historic road in contemporary highways accommodating faster and safer travel. In
Early in the history of the
White men settled the Greenbrier Valley beginning in the mid-1700s, but little is recorded of the western end of the county other than that Stephen Sewell hunted there. We occasionally dug up arrowheads in our garden, so Indians also hunted there. Population in western Greenbrier was sparse until the arrival of the Raine brothers. John Raine and his brother, T. W. Raine, appeared in 1903 when they purchased land on
The town of
Stage coach service along the Turnpike began in 1827 with a stage line operated by the Caldwell-Surbaugh stage company, which ran from Lewisburg to
Twentieth century developments necessitated changes in highway construction to accommodate automobiles. The road from Rainelle to
A tour book produced by the Midland Trail Association in 1916 describes the road as running from Meadow Bluff and over Little Sewell Mountain, the original course of the old Turnpike. By 1926 when Percival Reniers and Ashton Reniers wrote The Midland Trail Tour in West Virginia, the Midland Trail had deviated to follow the present Route 60. They write, “At Sam Black Church the Turnpike runs straight ahead over Little Sewell Mountain while the modern route bears right, down the easy grade of the Old Wilderness Road along
The Midland Trail had begun its modern incarnation, while the direct route over Little Sewell Mountain was historically preserved in its rural, peaceful nature, used mostly by the residents of the mountain and valleys between Rainelle and
In Rainelle the original turnpike, which is clearly marked with a street sign on
A few years ago I talked with Bobby Ayers, who at the time lived near Rainelle on the old turnpike. Near Dennis, where a post office had been located, he had found a watering trough used during “old” days on the Turnpike, as stated on the homemade sign someone long ago posted over the trough. Unless Bobby had told me about the trough, I would never have noticed it hiding under a clump of overgrown brush.
There is a lot of history hiding in just 10 miles of turnpike. The grave sites of the famous Greenbrier Ghost and her mother are located at
Highway marker which tells the story of the Greenbrier Ghost. |
After the turnpike improved travel through the mountains to
By 1889
Bible school held at Sewell Valley Baptist Church in the second building which was erected in 1962. |
The Osborne house as it appeared in the 1920s. The road is the Turnpike. Picture from K. C. Farren. |
In 1947 the Osbornes sub-divided the farm into building lots, creating what is still known as the Osborne Addition, a residential suburb of Rainelle. The road that had once provided a rocky trip on a stage coach from Lewisburg to
As homes continued to pop up in the Osborne Addition, Denzil and Audrey Simms opened a small store at the corner where Oak Street now connects with the turnpike. In the 1960s Squire Haynes developed a grass landing strip on top of Little Sewell Mountain that accommodated small aircraft, and he eventually opened a restaurant at the airport that served meals to flyers from all parts of the United States.
The building along the Turnpike where Denzil and Audrey Simms had a store. |
The site of the Osborne house as it appears today where Airport Road intersects the turnpike. |
Just as the old horse trough with its faded sign leaves only a trace of earlier travelers, the appearance of the
The home-made sign above the horse trough near the old site of the Dennis post office along the Turnpike. |
Saturday, October 29, 2011
The Little Foxes
"Catch for us the little foxes, the little foxes that ruin the vineyards, our vineyards that are in bloom." Solomon
In the last little while I've had the opportunity to have a discussion with a lawyer concerning the use of Sharia law in the United States courts. Now we all know that lawyers live on their own planet, and some of them actually think that planet is Earth. If you've ever been involved in any legal procedure at all, you've probably found that legal interpretations make little sense to the average person. Justice is blind, they say. Sometimes she's deaf, too.
Sharia law is quite involved, just as American law is; I'd almost bet my house that this lawyer doesn't understand or know the complexities of Sharia law. The situation we discussed was one involving a mosque in Florida, the current leaders, and a group of ex-trustees of said mosque. The disupte between these two groups involved a sum of money obtained from an eminent domain settlement. This is a civil suit, not a criminal case, and the two groups agreed to a mediation by the Florida court. The current leaders appealed a decision by the court to use Sharia law to settle the dispute, and the result of the appeal was for the case "to proceed under Ecclesiastical Islamic Law." According to the court order, the remainder of the hearing will be to determine if Islamic dispute resolution procedures have been followed.
The thinking of the lawyer is understandable: this decision does not preclude the use of US law, and the case is between two groups of Muslims. My question is why it is being heard in a Florida court if a decision is to be rendered on procedures of Islamic law? Procedures are provided in Sharia law for such a disagreement: if Islamic brothers cannot resolve a disagreement, they should go before the members of the mosque or the greater Islamic community. If that is not successful, the case can be heard by an Islamic judge. The current leaders of the Florida mosque apparently did not want to proceed under Islamic law; they sued in a Florida court. Now the appeals judge has agreed to hear the case, but pursuant to Islamic law. If the mosque leaders had wanted the case to be settled using Islamic law, why would they have sued in a Florida court?
The lawyer who shared his thoughts with me (including whether I had the ability to read) felt it was ridiculous and paranoid of me to think that this case indicated that Sharia law was creeping into US court systems. It's not paranoia if they're really out to get you.
Sharia law covers many aspects of life, including banking and finance. Business is conducted through partnerships, rather than corporations. Equity is shifted over time between institution and client, with the individual accepting equal consequences in losses as well as gains. According to James Crotty in the Cambridge Journal of Economics, Islamic financial and investment models are flourishing and taking root even in the West as Western corporations collapse.
I admit it. Sharia law scares me. When a political party tried to introduce Sharia law in Turkey, courts dissolved the political party in 1998, saying that democracy is the antithesis of Sharia. The party appealed to the European Court of Human Rights which ruled that Sharia is incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy.
As a woman, I find Sharia exceptionally distressing. Under Islamic law, women come out on the wrong end of honor killings, female genital mutilation, adolescent marriages, polygamy, and gender-biased inheritance rules. Statistics are impossible to determine in these areas, but the National Geographic reports that the UN says that thousands of women are murdered annually in family honor killings. In a National Geographic documentary Michael Davie reported that every day at least three women (including victims of rape) are victims of honor killings in Pakistan. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/02/0212_020212_honorkilling.html. One example cited involved a mentally impaired girl who was killed in front of the village tribunal. Just Google "honor killings" to read about the atrocities, including the increasing occurrences in Muslim families in the US.
The National Geographic article says that being labelled culturally insensitive inhibits the United States and the media from reporting these murders as honor killings. Hmmm. Seems I just read a book about Nazi Germany in the 1930s which said that the US did not intervene in the German government's abuse of its citizens because the US did not want to appear intrusive and heavy-handed. Besides, the German government owed us money.
Then there are the stories about the Muslims who want the entire world to be ruled by Sharia law. About three years ago the Archbishop of Canterbury in Great Britain suggested that Sharia law should be a component in British law. CBS News reports that at that time the British government quietly authorized Sharia judges to rule on divorces, financial disputes, and domestic violence cases, taking the place of legal solutions in the British courts. The report indicates that Sharia law is only binding in Britain if both parties agree. Ahhhhh!! Just like in the Florida civil suit.
NPR reports that US courts already recognize and enforce Sharia law in commercial contracts, divorce settlements, and wills. But in the same article Clark Lombardi is quoted as saying that we're not going to see violent, retaliatory enforcement of Sharia because it's inconsistent with our public policy, but our system is similar to the one in use in Britain. US law supersedes religious agreements if these agreements are based on tenents not congruent with our laws.
Now consider the rhetoric of one British citizen, Anjem Choudary, who has vowed that the "flag of Islam" will fly over the White House. He tried to organize a demonstration in Washington, but couldn't make it because he is on a no-fly list and was thus unable to travel to the US. He and the extremist group, Islamic Thinkers Society (based in New York), called the demonstration "a rally, a call for the Sharia, a call for the Muslims to rise up and establish the Islamic state in America." Choudary also said, "I think the American people's hearts and minds are open to receive Islam as an alternative way of life." Well, maybe in the case of a certain lawyer mentioned above and a judge in Florida.
Another statment of Choudary's concerning Sharia in Britain: "We are going to go to all these same areas and implement our own Sharia-controlled zones. We want to run the area as a Sharia-controlled zone and really to put the seeds down for an Islamic Emirate in the long term."
The little foxes are the ones who eat the grapes, a few at a time, and eventually the vineyard is destroyed. First, we decide contract issues according to Sharia, if both parties agree. Then a woman's divorce is settled according to Sharia. Before we know it, American citizens are demanding Sharia controlled zones. Then democracy dies.
In the last little while I've had the opportunity to have a discussion with a lawyer concerning the use of Sharia law in the United States courts. Now we all know that lawyers live on their own planet, and some of them actually think that planet is Earth. If you've ever been involved in any legal procedure at all, you've probably found that legal interpretations make little sense to the average person. Justice is blind, they say. Sometimes she's deaf, too.
Sharia law is quite involved, just as American law is; I'd almost bet my house that this lawyer doesn't understand or know the complexities of Sharia law. The situation we discussed was one involving a mosque in Florida, the current leaders, and a group of ex-trustees of said mosque. The disupte between these two groups involved a sum of money obtained from an eminent domain settlement. This is a civil suit, not a criminal case, and the two groups agreed to a mediation by the Florida court. The current leaders appealed a decision by the court to use Sharia law to settle the dispute, and the result of the appeal was for the case "to proceed under Ecclesiastical Islamic Law." According to the court order, the remainder of the hearing will be to determine if Islamic dispute resolution procedures have been followed.
The thinking of the lawyer is understandable: this decision does not preclude the use of US law, and the case is between two groups of Muslims. My question is why it is being heard in a Florida court if a decision is to be rendered on procedures of Islamic law? Procedures are provided in Sharia law for such a disagreement: if Islamic brothers cannot resolve a disagreement, they should go before the members of the mosque or the greater Islamic community. If that is not successful, the case can be heard by an Islamic judge. The current leaders of the Florida mosque apparently did not want to proceed under Islamic law; they sued in a Florida court. Now the appeals judge has agreed to hear the case, but pursuant to Islamic law. If the mosque leaders had wanted the case to be settled using Islamic law, why would they have sued in a Florida court?
The lawyer who shared his thoughts with me (including whether I had the ability to read) felt it was ridiculous and paranoid of me to think that this case indicated that Sharia law was creeping into US court systems. It's not paranoia if they're really out to get you.
Sharia law covers many aspects of life, including banking and finance. Business is conducted through partnerships, rather than corporations. Equity is shifted over time between institution and client, with the individual accepting equal consequences in losses as well as gains. According to James Crotty in the Cambridge Journal of Economics, Islamic financial and investment models are flourishing and taking root even in the West as Western corporations collapse.
I admit it. Sharia law scares me. When a political party tried to introduce Sharia law in Turkey, courts dissolved the political party in 1998, saying that democracy is the antithesis of Sharia. The party appealed to the European Court of Human Rights which ruled that Sharia is incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy.
As a woman, I find Sharia exceptionally distressing. Under Islamic law, women come out on the wrong end of honor killings, female genital mutilation, adolescent marriages, polygamy, and gender-biased inheritance rules. Statistics are impossible to determine in these areas, but the National Geographic reports that the UN says that thousands of women are murdered annually in family honor killings. In a National Geographic documentary Michael Davie reported that every day at least three women (including victims of rape) are victims of honor killings in Pakistan. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/02/0212_020212_honorkilling.html. One example cited involved a mentally impaired girl who was killed in front of the village tribunal. Just Google "honor killings" to read about the atrocities, including the increasing occurrences in Muslim families in the US.
The National Geographic article says that being labelled culturally insensitive inhibits the United States and the media from reporting these murders as honor killings. Hmmm. Seems I just read a book about Nazi Germany in the 1930s which said that the US did not intervene in the German government's abuse of its citizens because the US did not want to appear intrusive and heavy-handed. Besides, the German government owed us money.
Then there are the stories about the Muslims who want the entire world to be ruled by Sharia law. About three years ago the Archbishop of Canterbury in Great Britain suggested that Sharia law should be a component in British law. CBS News reports that at that time the British government quietly authorized Sharia judges to rule on divorces, financial disputes, and domestic violence cases, taking the place of legal solutions in the British courts. The report indicates that Sharia law is only binding in Britain if both parties agree. Ahhhhh!! Just like in the Florida civil suit.
NPR reports that US courts already recognize and enforce Sharia law in commercial contracts, divorce settlements, and wills. But in the same article Clark Lombardi is quoted as saying that we're not going to see violent, retaliatory enforcement of Sharia because it's inconsistent with our public policy, but our system is similar to the one in use in Britain. US law supersedes religious agreements if these agreements are based on tenents not congruent with our laws.
Now consider the rhetoric of one British citizen, Anjem Choudary, who has vowed that the "flag of Islam" will fly over the White House. He tried to organize a demonstration in Washington, but couldn't make it because he is on a no-fly list and was thus unable to travel to the US. He and the extremist group, Islamic Thinkers Society (based in New York), called the demonstration "a rally, a call for the Sharia, a call for the Muslims to rise up and establish the Islamic state in America." Choudary also said, "I think the American people's hearts and minds are open to receive Islam as an alternative way of life." Well, maybe in the case of a certain lawyer mentioned above and a judge in Florida.
Another statment of Choudary's concerning Sharia in Britain: "We are going to go to all these same areas and implement our own Sharia-controlled zones. We want to run the area as a Sharia-controlled zone and really to put the seeds down for an Islamic Emirate in the long term."
The little foxes are the ones who eat the grapes, a few at a time, and eventually the vineyard is destroyed. First, we decide contract issues according to Sharia, if both parties agree. Then a woman's divorce is settled according to Sharia. Before we know it, American citizens are demanding Sharia controlled zones. Then democracy dies.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Walking in the Tiergarten
Children called him Uncle Dolph. Generals called him fuehrer. The world called him monster.
Back when the History Channel actually had programs about history, it aired so many programs on Nazi Germany that we called it the Hitler channel. We learned about Hitler's family, Hitler's women, Hitler's health, Hitler's art. It's difficult to study and read about the leader of the Nazis without wondering how shopkeepers and bank clerks and mechanics succumbed to the charismatic leader of the Nazi party. They all but worshipped him. They lined up to die for him.
I am deeply interested in finding out in what kind of world this phenomenon could take place. Erik Larson's In the Garden of Beasts sketches a view of pre-World War II Berlin when Europe was on edge. The story is a personal one about an American family who moved to Berlin but were completely unprepared for Hitler's brutal ascent to power.
In the introduction Larson refers to photographs of the era, black and white photographs that fail to catch the vitality of the spirit of the times and what life looked like. This book sprints into the reality of life in Berlin with walks in the Tiergarten, outings to the countryside, and parties in the garden. Reality also included parades of Storm Troopers, assaults on Americans, and late night visits from the Gestapo. The book refers to the pervasive fear even within the Gestapo where everyone was under suspicion. One Gestapo officer was advised by his superior to always walk up a stair well against the wall because this would make it difficult for someone to get a clear shot at him from above. Which was the true Berlin: the "gemuetlich" city with the feel of a neighborly small town where people adored their dogs and horses or the murderous web of national plots ready to cleanse the society of anyone not fitting the Aryan model?
One screaming aspect of Nazi Germany is how un-Aryan the leaders were. None of them fit the Aryan perfection they sought to secure for the country. They were middle-aged men, a mediocre artist and a chicken farmer (Himmler), mainly seeking to secure absolute power for themselves.
Many Germans did not support the policies and actions of the Nazi party, but there were no heroes in this story. Remarks taken from diaries and letters of Americans reveal the undercurrent of the prejudice with which Jewish people were held. The Nazi officers were accepted in the most elite social circles in Berlin, and when people found some of their talk and actions distasteful, accommodations were made for their unsavory views. No one would have believed what would happen to Berlin in the next few years. It was just ordinary life with an unusual government in charge, which many believed the German people would not tolerate for long. Things, however, grew increasingly worse, and the book describes in detail the purge on June 30, 1934, when, according to estimates, nearly 100 people were pulled from their everyday lives and shot, and Hitler's hold on power was cemented in history.
Where were the Americans during this time? Reluctant to get involved. Why? Germany owed the United States millions of dollars in loans, and the American government was afraid Germany would default on those loans. Even when reports indicated Americans were randomly attacked in Germany, when reports indicated that Jewish people were persecuted and camps were filling up, when reports indicated a mammoth building up of military equipment and armies, the United States refused to disavow the Nazi government.
In the Garden of Beasts (named for the "tiergarten", a park in Berlin which means literally "animal garden") reveals what it was like to live in Berlin in 1934 when things began to go terribly wrong, before people began to understand that Hitler had more on his mind than uniting the German people. I don't think even the Nazis realized how much poison could pour out of their souls.
Back when the History Channel actually had programs about history, it aired so many programs on Nazi Germany that we called it the Hitler channel. We learned about Hitler's family, Hitler's women, Hitler's health, Hitler's art. It's difficult to study and read about the leader of the Nazis without wondering how shopkeepers and bank clerks and mechanics succumbed to the charismatic leader of the Nazi party. They all but worshipped him. They lined up to die for him.
I am deeply interested in finding out in what kind of world this phenomenon could take place. Erik Larson's In the Garden of Beasts sketches a view of pre-World War II Berlin when Europe was on edge. The story is a personal one about an American family who moved to Berlin but were completely unprepared for Hitler's brutal ascent to power.
In the introduction Larson refers to photographs of the era, black and white photographs that fail to catch the vitality of the spirit of the times and what life looked like. This book sprints into the reality of life in Berlin with walks in the Tiergarten, outings to the countryside, and parties in the garden. Reality also included parades of Storm Troopers, assaults on Americans, and late night visits from the Gestapo. The book refers to the pervasive fear even within the Gestapo where everyone was under suspicion. One Gestapo officer was advised by his superior to always walk up a stair well against the wall because this would make it difficult for someone to get a clear shot at him from above. Which was the true Berlin: the "gemuetlich" city with the feel of a neighborly small town where people adored their dogs and horses or the murderous web of national plots ready to cleanse the society of anyone not fitting the Aryan model?
One screaming aspect of Nazi Germany is how un-Aryan the leaders were. None of them fit the Aryan perfection they sought to secure for the country. They were middle-aged men, a mediocre artist and a chicken farmer (Himmler), mainly seeking to secure absolute power for themselves.
Many Germans did not support the policies and actions of the Nazi party, but there were no heroes in this story. Remarks taken from diaries and letters of Americans reveal the undercurrent of the prejudice with which Jewish people were held. The Nazi officers were accepted in the most elite social circles in Berlin, and when people found some of their talk and actions distasteful, accommodations were made for their unsavory views. No one would have believed what would happen to Berlin in the next few years. It was just ordinary life with an unusual government in charge, which many believed the German people would not tolerate for long. Things, however, grew increasingly worse, and the book describes in detail the purge on June 30, 1934, when, according to estimates, nearly 100 people were pulled from their everyday lives and shot, and Hitler's hold on power was cemented in history.
Where were the Americans during this time? Reluctant to get involved. Why? Germany owed the United States millions of dollars in loans, and the American government was afraid Germany would default on those loans. Even when reports indicated Americans were randomly attacked in Germany, when reports indicated that Jewish people were persecuted and camps were filling up, when reports indicated a mammoth building up of military equipment and armies, the United States refused to disavow the Nazi government.
In the Garden of Beasts (named for the "tiergarten", a park in Berlin which means literally "animal garden") reveals what it was like to live in Berlin in 1934 when things began to go terribly wrong, before people began to understand that Hitler had more on his mind than uniting the German people. I don't think even the Nazis realized how much poison could pour out of their souls.
Labels:
Erik Larson,
Germany,
Himmler,
Hitler,
In the Garden of Beasts,
Nazi,
World War II
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
A Season of Change
Looking southeast. |
These photos were taken last week when the color was just peaking. All of the photos are taken near my house on an afternoon walk. The trees on the mountain are in full color, but in the lower elevation, leaves are much greener, not yet so colorful.
While I walked along my regular route, the mountains were so colorful that I made a special trip back to the house to get my camera. The sun broke through clouds drifting along the rolling hills making a dramatic show. We have not yet had a frost, so the flowers are still blooming. Along the road are broad patches of chicory still lifting little faces to the sun.
Chicory. |
If you walk with your head down, you come across the most interesting things. I don't know what made me notice the paw print, but there it was, as plain as day. My first thought was that it was the track of a bear. Yes, a bear. Right in the middle of a housing development. I showed this picture to several people, and most voted for a bear track. I asked my neighbor, an old farmer, hunter, and fisherman, to walk down and look at the print which was right across the street from our house. Yep. He thought it was a bear track also, and he said his wife had actually seen a bear along the road about two miles or so from where we live. He said that bears don't have homes but wander around, and that this may have been a young bear who was kicked out by its mama. When our dog starts barking wildly now, we no longer assume it is for no reason.
Anonymous paw print. |
At the top of the hill the view opens up across the valley to the mountain range that contains the highest mountain in Virginia, Mt. Rogers, 5,729 feet. North Carolina lies just across the mountains. Rocks on Mt. Rogers indicate that volcanoes helped create this mountain range. William Barton Rogers, the first Virginia state geologist, is the namesake of the mountain and later helped to found M.I.T. There is a high-altitude spruce forest on the top of Mt. Rogers, and I understand that people can hike there. I'm pretty sure I never will.
At this point I turn right, heading due west, and walk out to the cornfield and barn. I loved that corn field this summer, and I'm sure the deer did, also. Now things are different out there. The corn has been harvested, and just in the last couple of days, new shoots of some kind of grass has sprouted for winter cover.
This is the season of change. Young bears are sent packing; corn shocks are chipped up and put in a silo; wildflowers bask in the last days of warm sun before the frost.
He changes times and seasons; he sets up kings and deposes them. He gives wisdom to the wise and knowledge to the discerning. Daniel 2:21
The corn field after the harvest. |
Labels:
autumn,
changing seasons,
mountains,
Mt. Rogers,
Virginia
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Help Me, Mary Jane!
By no means do I mean to elevate the public's cry for Mary Jane with Will Ferrell's plea for help from Chuck Norris. Who is Mary Jane, you ask? Cannabis, pot, weed, smoke.
A Facebook flare this week started with a post claiming that there are NO deaths from marijuana use as compared to deaths from the use of alcohol, tobacco, and prescription drugs. The discussion turned to legalizing the growing, selling, and use of marijuana. Those who advocate the legalization of marijuana use think that the country should tap into that walloping source of income; fewer people would die because there would no longer be turf wars between dope peddlars staking out territory for their now illegal sales. Besides, it's a natural substance. These same arguments can be made for cocaine.
No one wanted to discuss the researched side effects of the use of marijuana. By doing an internet search on the terms, "side effects of marijuana", I found several interesting articles, some by people who describe how difficult it was to quit using the drug. Can you say "addictive"? The National Institutes of Health (http://www.nida.nih.gov/Infofacts/marijuana.html) lists side effects of marijuana use as "distorted perceptions, impaired coordination, difficulty with thinking and problem solving, and problems with learning and memory", as well as the depression of natural immunological functions. These effects can last for days or weeks. Having problems with basic algebra? Try putting down the joint. Someone who smokes marijuana everyday may function at a "suboptimal" intellectual level all of the time. Constant users also have a 25-50 per cent chance of becoming addicted to the drug.
Marijuana increases the heart rate by 20-100 percent shortly after smoking; this effect can last up to 3 hours. In one study, it was estimated that marijuana users have a 4.8-fold increase in the risk of heart attack in the first hour after smoking the drug. The smoke from marijuana has 50-70 per cent more carcinogenic hydrocarbons than tobacco smoke. Respondents on that previously mentioned Facebook flare stated that they just "refused" to believe that marijuana smoke was more harmful than cigarette smoke.
I started college in 1968 when pot was the drug of choice for most people. The drug was everywhere on campus. I know what it smells like, so if you have been smoking cannabis, I can smell it on you. I've been around people who searched their coat pockets to find a marijuana seed to eat, just as a person described in an internet article how they constantly searched their bedroom, their couch, their car to find just a scrap of the herb that might be left over.
Although anxiety is listed as a side effect of the drug, I found an article on the internet which advocated using marijuana as an antidote for anxiety and stress problems. This article also stated that there was "little to no risk" involved in using marijuana which is helpful in giving a person a different perspective so that they will be better able to solve their problems. Cigarette smoke is a stimulant, but smokers desire to smoke to calm down. It's the addiction that makes smokers nervous when they don't smoke and drives them to get a hit of nicotine. When the addiction is satisfied, they feel calmer. So it is with marijuana: the habitual user is anxious without the drug and feels less stressed when using it.
Yes, I've been around many of those people who are medicating so that they can better solve their problems. Their vacant stares and inability to focus precede their concerns about their failing grades. Those people I knew in college who were picking seeds out of their pockets? They didn't graduate. They were absorbed into the pot culture, constantly seeking the drug, talking about the drug, smoking the drug. Their lives were completely taken up with the pointy leaf.
Other than the physical problems people experience from marijuana use, one ex-user on the internet pointed to the nearly $20,000 they had spent on pot--the same amount as a down payment on a home or the price of a new car. The irony of this situation is that the people whose perceptions and whose thinking and problem-solving ability have been altered by the use of marijuana are the people who most strongly champion the legalizing of the drug.
A Facebook flare this week started with a post claiming that there are NO deaths from marijuana use as compared to deaths from the use of alcohol, tobacco, and prescription drugs. The discussion turned to legalizing the growing, selling, and use of marijuana. Those who advocate the legalization of marijuana use think that the country should tap into that walloping source of income; fewer people would die because there would no longer be turf wars between dope peddlars staking out territory for their now illegal sales. Besides, it's a natural substance. These same arguments can be made for cocaine.
No one wanted to discuss the researched side effects of the use of marijuana. By doing an internet search on the terms, "side effects of marijuana", I found several interesting articles, some by people who describe how difficult it was to quit using the drug. Can you say "addictive"? The National Institutes of Health (http://www.nida.nih.gov/Infofacts/marijuana.html) lists side effects of marijuana use as "distorted perceptions, impaired coordination, difficulty with thinking and problem solving, and problems with learning and memory", as well as the depression of natural immunological functions. These effects can last for days or weeks. Having problems with basic algebra? Try putting down the joint. Someone who smokes marijuana everyday may function at a "suboptimal" intellectual level all of the time. Constant users also have a 25-50 per cent chance of becoming addicted to the drug.
Marijuana increases the heart rate by 20-100 percent shortly after smoking; this effect can last up to 3 hours. In one study, it was estimated that marijuana users have a 4.8-fold increase in the risk of heart attack in the first hour after smoking the drug. The smoke from marijuana has 50-70 per cent more carcinogenic hydrocarbons than tobacco smoke. Respondents on that previously mentioned Facebook flare stated that they just "refused" to believe that marijuana smoke was more harmful than cigarette smoke.
I started college in 1968 when pot was the drug of choice for most people. The drug was everywhere on campus. I know what it smells like, so if you have been smoking cannabis, I can smell it on you. I've been around people who searched their coat pockets to find a marijuana seed to eat, just as a person described in an internet article how they constantly searched their bedroom, their couch, their car to find just a scrap of the herb that might be left over.
Although anxiety is listed as a side effect of the drug, I found an article on the internet which advocated using marijuana as an antidote for anxiety and stress problems. This article also stated that there was "little to no risk" involved in using marijuana which is helpful in giving a person a different perspective so that they will be better able to solve their problems. Cigarette smoke is a stimulant, but smokers desire to smoke to calm down. It's the addiction that makes smokers nervous when they don't smoke and drives them to get a hit of nicotine. When the addiction is satisfied, they feel calmer. So it is with marijuana: the habitual user is anxious without the drug and feels less stressed when using it.
Yes, I've been around many of those people who are medicating so that they can better solve their problems. Their vacant stares and inability to focus precede their concerns about their failing grades. Those people I knew in college who were picking seeds out of their pockets? They didn't graduate. They were absorbed into the pot culture, constantly seeking the drug, talking about the drug, smoking the drug. Their lives were completely taken up with the pointy leaf.
Other than the physical problems people experience from marijuana use, one ex-user on the internet pointed to the nearly $20,000 they had spent on pot--the same amount as a down payment on a home or the price of a new car. The irony of this situation is that the people whose perceptions and whose thinking and problem-solving ability have been altered by the use of marijuana are the people who most strongly champion the legalizing of the drug.
Saturday, October 1, 2011
Dream a Little Dream
If you watch any television at all, you will notice that some terms and phrases catch fire and burn through every conversation among the dunce he...I mean, talking heads. When George W. Bush was president, Dick Cheney said that something went "beyond the pale." What the heck does that mean? But in no time, the phrase was used at least once, sometimes more often, by every commentator on television.
I looked up the phrase and found an excellent explanation on www.phrases.org/uk (http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/beyond-the-pale.html). The definition includes some Jewish history in Russia and the date of the first use of the phrase which has to do with palings, as in a fence. Originally it dealt with keeping certain groups of people outside the normal society.
As with so much of what is discussed these days, the phrase was repeated over and over and over...well, too many times. This also happened with the word "disingenuous" and more recently with the phrase "kick the can down the road", when someone talked about our inability to deal with the American debt crisis.
Now the phrase of the day is "American dream", as in, "People come to our country to pursue the American dream," or "People are not able anymore to achieve the American dream." As it so often happens with a vague term, the phrase takes on various meanings, depending on which person is using it.
"American dream" is so vague that it really doesn't have any meaning. In a conversation these types of phrases are like static on the radio and snow on the television. It's indistinct sound and a hazy whiteness that interferes with true understanding.
America is a country of individuals, a country, more than any other, that allows for expression of the individual. In defining "American dream", there is no collective aspiration that is common among all our citizens. There is no American dream.
There are millions of dreams, though, particular and peculiar for each individual. People with cancer dream of surviving another day, of seeing the sun come up and having no pain. Mothers who have worked decades at minimum wage jobs dream of watching their children live a financially secure life. Homeless people dream of sleeping in a dry, warm bed. Pastors dream of conducting a committee meeting where no one gets angry. Corporate executives dream of having 24 hours uninterrupted by phone calls and anxious assistants with unbalanced spreadsheets.
I went to college as a young woman, not because of lofty aspirations, but because I really had nothing else to do and nowhere else to go. I had no money. I had no job. I had no idea what I wanted to do. People look at my life and say that I have accomplished the American dream. No, I have not. Anything I have accomplished is only through the grace of God, with no foresight on my part. I could never have dreamed the things that have actually occurred in my life. Reality, while disconcerting and surprising at many times, has turned out overall to be much better than anything I could have planned.
Each of us has a dream of some kind, but there is no American dream that all of us have. Raised by parents from the "greatest" generation, I realize that there is work to do, and no matter what I'm doing, I need to commit everything I have to it. So things haven't worked out the way you thought they would? Margaret Rucker was the administrator of what was called the Department of Welfare in the 1970s in Mercer County. She once told a woman who was experiencing difficult times to "get up off your knees". In other words, stand up and do what you have to do. The opportunity to do just that is the only dream that Americans have.
I looked up the phrase and found an excellent explanation on www.phrases.org/uk (http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/beyond-the-pale.html). The definition includes some Jewish history in Russia and the date of the first use of the phrase which has to do with palings, as in a fence. Originally it dealt with keeping certain groups of people outside the normal society.
As with so much of what is discussed these days, the phrase was repeated over and over and over...well, too many times. This also happened with the word "disingenuous" and more recently with the phrase "kick the can down the road", when someone talked about our inability to deal with the American debt crisis.
Now the phrase of the day is "American dream", as in, "People come to our country to pursue the American dream," or "People are not able anymore to achieve the American dream." As it so often happens with a vague term, the phrase takes on various meanings, depending on which person is using it.
"American dream" is so vague that it really doesn't have any meaning. In a conversation these types of phrases are like static on the radio and snow on the television. It's indistinct sound and a hazy whiteness that interferes with true understanding.
America is a country of individuals, a country, more than any other, that allows for expression of the individual. In defining "American dream", there is no collective aspiration that is common among all our citizens. There is no American dream.
There are millions of dreams, though, particular and peculiar for each individual. People with cancer dream of surviving another day, of seeing the sun come up and having no pain. Mothers who have worked decades at minimum wage jobs dream of watching their children live a financially secure life. Homeless people dream of sleeping in a dry, warm bed. Pastors dream of conducting a committee meeting where no one gets angry. Corporate executives dream of having 24 hours uninterrupted by phone calls and anxious assistants with unbalanced spreadsheets.
I went to college as a young woman, not because of lofty aspirations, but because I really had nothing else to do and nowhere else to go. I had no money. I had no job. I had no idea what I wanted to do. People look at my life and say that I have accomplished the American dream. No, I have not. Anything I have accomplished is only through the grace of God, with no foresight on my part. I could never have dreamed the things that have actually occurred in my life. Reality, while disconcerting and surprising at many times, has turned out overall to be much better than anything I could have planned.
Each of us has a dream of some kind, but there is no American dream that all of us have. Raised by parents from the "greatest" generation, I realize that there is work to do, and no matter what I'm doing, I need to commit everything I have to it. So things haven't worked out the way you thought they would? Margaret Rucker was the administrator of what was called the Department of Welfare in the 1970s in Mercer County. She once told a woman who was experiencing difficult times to "get up off your knees". In other words, stand up and do what you have to do. The opportunity to do just that is the only dream that Americans have.
Friday, September 23, 2011
When Lynch Mobs Ruled
Every family has those stories. You know what I mean. Those stories. Many genealogists refuse to include those stories in their reports: the unmarried mother, the horse thief, the Army deserter. Undoubtedly, the most famous story coming from our family archives involves the brother of my husband's great-grandfather who was one of the victims in the only lynching to ever take place in Kanawha County, West Virginia. That isn't the way I would want to be remembered, but the story is definitely a true one.
The name Rufus is a Biblical name meaning "red-haired" according to my Funk & Wagnalls. I have never seen a photo of Rufus Estep or read a description of his physical characteristics, so I have no idea what color his hair was. He was the third child of Wesley and Mary (Polly) Pritt Estep. Wesley had been a soldier in the Union Army during the recent unpleasantness, serving in Company E of the 8th Regiment of the West Virginia Volunteer Infantry.
Rufus would have been completely anonymous if it had not been for the lynching. Louis Harlan writes of the environment in Malden at that time in Booker T. Washington in Perspective. The economy was depressed and not diverse, depending on the salt works and the coal mines on Campbell's Creek. In the late 1870s the situation improved a little with the salt works working to fill some orders. Child labor substituted for adult employees; there weren't enough jobs to employ the entire working population of the area. Grown men with much time on their hands spent a great deal of it drinking which led to labor unrest and other violence. "A week seldom passed without a violent death or maiming accident in the coal mines, a drowning in creek or river, or a scalding in the boilers and vats of the salt works." Saturday was payday at the Campbell's Creek mines and that led to drinking and street fights on Saturday night in Malden.
The story has been copied and printed many times. The most often cited report about Rufus is found in the account given by George W. Atkinson's History of Kanawha County, 1876. On Christmas Eve, 1875, a 40-year-old man named Thomas Lee was murdered on an iron bridge crossing Campbell's Creek at Malden, West Virginia. No mention is made about how officials determined who the suspects were in the case. I have my own opinion, but however the investigation developed, on Christmas Day the police arrested Rufus Estep and John Dawson and placed them in jail in Charleston. Kind of ruins the family dinner on Christmas.
Public opinion was so outraged by this unprovoked murder that a mob formed after Lee's family insisted they were not going to let the murderers get off in court. Harlan writes that only one man in 25 years had been hanged for murder even though there were an average of two murders per year. Because of the murmuring mob, the sheriff, Philip W. Morgan, enlisted the help of John Lentz, John Perry, and Silas Morgan, waited until dark and then transported Estep and Dawson to the Cabell County jail in Barboursville. In a version of three-card monty, two days later the prisoners were moved to the Wood County jail in Parkersburg where the prisoners were kept until their court date in January 1876.
The Kanawha County court and the prosecuting attorney determined that there was no longer any danger of mob violence, so back to Charleston came Rufus Estep and John Dawson. Exactly one month after the murder Estep and Dawson were arraigned in the Kanawha County court on the charge of murder. Their attorneys, R. H. Freer and Abram Burlew, requested a change of venue, due to the armed mob knocking on the court house doors. John Kenna and James Ferguson, attorneys for the state, strongly opposed the request, and Judge Joseph Smith adjourned court so that he could consider the request and render a decision the next morning. Estep and Dawson were returned to their cells while a mob of about 450 men continued to assail the court house.
On this same day, another murder occurred on Anderson Street where Thomas Hines, a white man, cut the throat of J. W. Dooley, a black man, in Dooley's shoe shop. Hines was also placed in the Kanawha County jail. That night the mob advanced on the jail and took Dawson and Estep. At the same time a mob of about 50 black men joined in to take control of Hines. The reasoning of the second mob was that Hines would get off his charge of murdering a black man because he was white.
Both of these mobs and their prisoners travelled to the bridge over Campbell's Creek in Malden (the same site of the murder of Thomas Lee), a distance of about six miles. In the minds of the first mob, I suppose it was justice that the lynching would occur at the site of the murder. There was discussion, according to Harlan, that it wasn't right for black men to lynch a white man and that the white mob should lynch all three prisoners. In an equal opportunity moment, it was decided to let the black mob take care of their own business. Dawson and Estep were lynched at the bridge; Hines was lynched on a honey-locust tree about 300 yards above the bridge. The next morning the authorities (unnamed in the narrative) cut down the bodies and buried them. No mention is made of where the men were buried.
Now the story does not end here. George W. Atkinson, the author of this version of the story, was a young lawyer at the time of the lynching and an eye witness to much of the action. It is said that he tried to reason with the lynch mobs before they overran the jail cells. Atkinson became governor of West Virginia in 1896. While he was governor, he was requested to come to the bedside of a dying man in Campbell's Creek who confessed to the governor that he had murdered Tom Lee at the Campbell's Creek bridge. Governor Atkinson did not reveal this information until a few days before his death in 1925. He told a Charleston Daily Mail reporter about the death bed confession and said he didn't reveal it because he "lacked legal evidence". According to the reporter, Atkinson said the dying man was within hearing distance when Estep and Dawson pleaded for their lives. The dying man had held a grudge against Tom Lee and that is why he murdered him.
So there you have it. This is the story as it is told in various sources. I've not reviewed every source or version of the story, and I have many questions. Did Governor Atkinson keep mum because he had an attorny/client relationship with the dying man? Why did that man call the Governor to hear his confession? I'm curious as to what evidence existed that led to the arrest of Rufus Estep and John Dawson. My first guess: a witness who may have been the very person who later confessed on his death bed and was actually in the lynch mob in January 1876, but I'm an extremely suspicious person. A look at the court records would be interesting. Were Rufus and John on the bridge at all that night? Did they perhaps discover the body after Tom Lee had been killed? Where is Perry Mason when you need him most.
The name Rufus is a Biblical name meaning "red-haired" according to my Funk & Wagnalls. I have never seen a photo of Rufus Estep or read a description of his physical characteristics, so I have no idea what color his hair was. He was the third child of Wesley and Mary (Polly) Pritt Estep. Wesley had been a soldier in the Union Army during the recent unpleasantness, serving in Company E of the 8th Regiment of the West Virginia Volunteer Infantry.
Rufus would have been completely anonymous if it had not been for the lynching. Louis Harlan writes of the environment in Malden at that time in Booker T. Washington in Perspective. The economy was depressed and not diverse, depending on the salt works and the coal mines on Campbell's Creek. In the late 1870s the situation improved a little with the salt works working to fill some orders. Child labor substituted for adult employees; there weren't enough jobs to employ the entire working population of the area. Grown men with much time on their hands spent a great deal of it drinking which led to labor unrest and other violence. "A week seldom passed without a violent death or maiming accident in the coal mines, a drowning in creek or river, or a scalding in the boilers and vats of the salt works." Saturday was payday at the Campbell's Creek mines and that led to drinking and street fights on Saturday night in Malden.
The story has been copied and printed many times. The most often cited report about Rufus is found in the account given by George W. Atkinson's History of Kanawha County, 1876. On Christmas Eve, 1875, a 40-year-old man named Thomas Lee was murdered on an iron bridge crossing Campbell's Creek at Malden, West Virginia. No mention is made about how officials determined who the suspects were in the case. I have my own opinion, but however the investigation developed, on Christmas Day the police arrested Rufus Estep and John Dawson and placed them in jail in Charleston. Kind of ruins the family dinner on Christmas.
Public opinion was so outraged by this unprovoked murder that a mob formed after Lee's family insisted they were not going to let the murderers get off in court. Harlan writes that only one man in 25 years had been hanged for murder even though there were an average of two murders per year. Because of the murmuring mob, the sheriff, Philip W. Morgan, enlisted the help of John Lentz, John Perry, and Silas Morgan, waited until dark and then transported Estep and Dawson to the Cabell County jail in Barboursville. In a version of three-card monty, two days later the prisoners were moved to the Wood County jail in Parkersburg where the prisoners were kept until their court date in January 1876.
The Kanawha County court and the prosecuting attorney determined that there was no longer any danger of mob violence, so back to Charleston came Rufus Estep and John Dawson. Exactly one month after the murder Estep and Dawson were arraigned in the Kanawha County court on the charge of murder. Their attorneys, R. H. Freer and Abram Burlew, requested a change of venue, due to the armed mob knocking on the court house doors. John Kenna and James Ferguson, attorneys for the state, strongly opposed the request, and Judge Joseph Smith adjourned court so that he could consider the request and render a decision the next morning. Estep and Dawson were returned to their cells while a mob of about 450 men continued to assail the court house.
On this same day, another murder occurred on Anderson Street where Thomas Hines, a white man, cut the throat of J. W. Dooley, a black man, in Dooley's shoe shop. Hines was also placed in the Kanawha County jail. That night the mob advanced on the jail and took Dawson and Estep. At the same time a mob of about 50 black men joined in to take control of Hines. The reasoning of the second mob was that Hines would get off his charge of murdering a black man because he was white.
Both of these mobs and their prisoners travelled to the bridge over Campbell's Creek in Malden (the same site of the murder of Thomas Lee), a distance of about six miles. In the minds of the first mob, I suppose it was justice that the lynching would occur at the site of the murder. There was discussion, according to Harlan, that it wasn't right for black men to lynch a white man and that the white mob should lynch all three prisoners. In an equal opportunity moment, it was decided to let the black mob take care of their own business. Dawson and Estep were lynched at the bridge; Hines was lynched on a honey-locust tree about 300 yards above the bridge. The next morning the authorities (unnamed in the narrative) cut down the bodies and buried them. No mention is made of where the men were buried.
Now the story does not end here. George W. Atkinson, the author of this version of the story, was a young lawyer at the time of the lynching and an eye witness to much of the action. It is said that he tried to reason with the lynch mobs before they overran the jail cells. Atkinson became governor of West Virginia in 1896. While he was governor, he was requested to come to the bedside of a dying man in Campbell's Creek who confessed to the governor that he had murdered Tom Lee at the Campbell's Creek bridge. Governor Atkinson did not reveal this information until a few days before his death in 1925. He told a Charleston Daily Mail reporter about the death bed confession and said he didn't reveal it because he "lacked legal evidence". According to the reporter, Atkinson said the dying man was within hearing distance when Estep and Dawson pleaded for their lives. The dying man had held a grudge against Tom Lee and that is why he murdered him.
So there you have it. This is the story as it is told in various sources. I've not reviewed every source or version of the story, and I have many questions. Did Governor Atkinson keep mum because he had an attorny/client relationship with the dying man? Why did that man call the Governor to hear his confession? I'm curious as to what evidence existed that led to the arrest of Rufus Estep and John Dawson. My first guess: a witness who may have been the very person who later confessed on his death bed and was actually in the lynch mob in January 1876, but I'm an extremely suspicious person. A look at the court records would be interesting. Were Rufus and John on the bridge at all that night? Did they perhaps discover the body after Tom Lee had been killed? Where is Perry Mason when you need him most.
Labels:
George Atkinson,
John Dawson,
Kanawha County,
lynching,
Rufus Estep,
Thomas Hines,
Thomas Lee,
West Virginia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)